×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Pueblo County Consolidated Draft

Staff Draft

This document is the staff draft of the Consolidated Draft of Pueblo County's new Unified Development Code. To help viewers more easily identify changes made since each individual Modual review, the document has been uploaded showing tracked changes, with new content shown in blue font. Questions for staff have been left throughout the document in yellow highlighted footnotes. Please be sure to address the questions we've left in addition to any other comments you have on the draft.

There will be three staff worksessions to review and discuss Consolidate Draft content, as listed below:

  • Monday, July 8: Zone Districts and Uses (M1 focus)
  • Friday, July 12: Development Standards (M2 focus)
  • Monday, July 15: Administration and Procedures (M3 focus)

Thank you!
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.

in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:58PM on page 252

Would we review??? And what are we looking for?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:52PM on page 234

Carmen, Do we do this? Who?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:37PM on page 24

Yes
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:36PM on page 63

Am I missing where this footnote is indicated above?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:35PM on page 62

Current is 15' - Why are we changing any of them?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:34PM on page 18

25' is current standard.
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:33PM on page 18

Current standard is 20'.
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:32PM on page 11

Light Industrial currently is 20' - Why change at all?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:28PM on page 54

Are we changing from 15' to 10'?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:27PM on page 53

This is for a single-family dwelling only, correct? Do we need to state that?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:25PM on page 52

15 feet?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 2:24PM on page 51

R-3 states it must be 70' wide for a two-family dwelling....
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 1:51PM on page 42

Is this for a whole subdivision? Or is this individual houses?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 1:49PM on page 11

Current standard for R-A: No parcel of land shall be less than seventy (70) feet in width nor exceed four and one-half (4 1/2) times the width in depth. A-3/4 is 140' wide or deep
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 1:48PM on page 11

It also means it would drain from the roof onto someone else's property..... Maybe needs to say must drain to front or rear of said property....no encroachment.
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:57AM on page 38

Minimum 100' ? 140' is current standard
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:55AM on page 38

25'
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:54AM on page 45

I think it is 300ft wide currently.
replies

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:47AM on page 32

25 ft
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:47AM on page 28

Accessory buildings, if wanted in front yard, should have to abide by the front yard setback for the main structure.....
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 11:43AM on page 41

May need to add a line about rezoning?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 10:05AM on page 221

Yes, I believe so.
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 17 2024 at 9:41AM on page 219

Is this a crosswalk?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 2:19PM on page 572

I still feel the types of signs is too much....None are similar enough to be combined?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 2:17PM on page 568

Is this different than electronic message board?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 2:05PM on page 85

Nail salons? Maybe combine nail salons, cosmeticians, hairstylists, etc into Beauty Salons?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:51PM on page 545

What about "licensed premises"?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:47PM on page 544

Should "properly" be deleted also? This sentence doesn't make sense...
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:29PM on page 538

Do any of these new ones incorporate "halfway houses"?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:12PM on page 535

Not including "Floor Area Ratio"
replies
in reply to KatrinaP's comment

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:11PM on page 534

PCC currently states: "Floor Area, Net" means the square footage totaling seventy-five (75) percent of the gross floor area; or, when an "as-built," detailed floor plan or current use plan can identify a lesser or greater amount of usable floor area which can be demonstrated by the sum of the horizontal area measured between the interior face of the exterior walls or all usable floors of a building, accessory buildings (including interior balconies and mezzanines) and surrounding open spaces wherein goods and services are offered or displayed, but excluding interior walls, enclosed hallways, stairwells, shafts, lavatories, furnace room, janitor supply rooms and closets, interior parking and loading areas, and inventory stock rooms.
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:10PM on page 534

I do not believe this is the correct definition of net floor area......
replies
in reply to KatrinaP's comment

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 1:00PM on page 518

NEVER MIND! Found it!!!
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 12:55PM on page 522

Capital I
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 12:49PM on page 518

What about a brewery? Is that listed elsewhere?
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 12:42PM on page 517

Will we include farm animals, etc in this definition? Farmers often go to auction barns to buy animals.
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 12:40PM on page 516

What about "Amusement Facilities"? carnivals, fairs, archery, arcades, etc
replies

KatrinaP Jul 16 2024 at 12:39PM on page 516

Some churches offer Mother's Day Out and daycare. Do we consider those accessory uses?
replies

strongemma Jul 16 2024 at 10:53AM on page 517

Suggestion
"structure"
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

Petersm Jul 16 2024 at 9:35AM on page 381

per co statutes, the following are within the scope of the pcpc...
replies
in reply to Petersm's comment

strongemma Jul 16 2024 at 9:26AM on page 308

not all pre-app meetings use the sketch plan app (like for 1041 cases)
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

strongemma Jul 16 2024 at 9:22AM on page 306

Suggestion
UDC definitions do not include definitions of "resubdivision" or "minor subdivision" - perhaps we need to add
replies

strongemma Jul 16 2024 at 9:19AM on page 580

Question
What is the significance of having this definition when we have a definition for recreational vehicle, which includes travel trailers? why are there size restrictions in this definition? how would this factor into our regulations and enforcement?
replies

Petersm Jul 16 2024 at 9:01AM on page 308

we call these sketch plans on opengov. Do we want to change the app type in opengov?
replies

strongemma Jul 16 2024 at 8:58AM on page 303

Question
do we have a definition for "administrative officer" somewhere? is this to mean anyone working for the County? anyone in a supervisory role? anyone who may contribute to the reports and recommendations? the term feels vague and confusing to me
replies

SiteAdmin Jul 15 2024 at 11:00AM on page 154

KP: Doesn't this contradict above? Or is (1) meant for visitors of landowners?
replies

SiteAdmin Jul 15 2024 at 10:59AM on page 154

KP: Why would they camp if they have a permanent structure? Or is this not meant for landowners, but for visitors of landowners?
replies
in reply to howardca's comment

SiteAdmin Jul 15 2024 at 10:58AM on page 169

KP: One (1) one-square foot sign is permitted.
replies

SiteAdmin Jul 15 2024 at 10:57AM on page 151

KP: Current Code has a statement that there is no limit of Home Occupations (17.120.030<3>) Are we leaving that out?
replies

SiteAdmin Jul 15 2024 at 10:52AM on page 182

KP: Elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which...
replies
View all