×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Module 3: Administration and Procedures - TAC Draft

The third Module of the Pueblo County Unified Development Code focuses on updates to the County's administrative procedures. This draft contains a combination of new content and content from existing Title 16 (Subdivisions) and Title 17 (Zoning) that was revised and formatted for the new UDC. Throughout the draft there are footnotes that describe the source section, significant changes, or commentary for many of the provisions that originated from the current Zoning Code. 

Please review and provide comments on Module 3: Administration and Procedures in advance of our upcoming meeting on May 14, and be prepared to discuss.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Suggestion
This CODE has no BITE and people will continue to do whatever they want. Especially make more light pollution.
replies
Suggestion
Response review = 14 days.
replies
Question
What are evaporative soils? Collapsible soil? This term is confusing to a geotechnical engineer.
replies
Suggestion
Site selection and construction of mass transit such as rail?
replies
Question
reference? What pipeline? This is way to vague.
replies
Question
reference?
replies
Question
reference?
replies
Suggestion
County needs a time requirement. Not just the applicant
replies
Suggestion
County review must be completed in 45 days
replies
Suggestion
Landfills
replies
Suggestion
Widen section so the reference in on a single line.
replies
in reply to manginir's comment
Suggestion
1/2 a mile seems a long ways
replies
Suggestion
Shouldn't this include all of the agencies involved?? Not just the county. Could Pueblo Means Business spearhead this and provide a meeting location, screens/computers, and organize the meeting so the county, cdot, utility companies, fire department, ditch companies all be involved from the beginning?
replies
Question
table?
replies
source?
replies
Question
Source?
replies
Suggestion
Reviewer and decision maker should be a Colorado Licensed P.E. to review drainage and soil slope and make recommendations.
replies
Suggestion
Since 1990 no county surveyor has maintained the monuments used to establish accurate GPS Coordinates for Land Use Applications. if this is not done soon, we need to eliminate the required ties to the monuments.
replies
Suggestion
we have not changed anything with this collateral method that just will not go away. This is the same thing we have put up with for years. We need to talk more about this.
replies
Suggestion
2500 feet! Should be 1300 feet more or less. I have done meetings at the Arts Center due to large residential development next to my proposed application. I would have to send out 250 letters if the 2500 feet is adopted.
replies
Suggestion
Neighborhood meetings should not be made mandatory. This should happen only if planning receives negative comments from neighboring property owners.
replies
<>?
replies
no table
replies
Question
Should the director's reasoning for waiving or modifying requirements be kept on record?
replies
****
replies
Question
Grammar?
replies
Question
Section??
replies
Question
Missing??
replies
Question
Missing something?
replies
Question
Does the county have catastrophic failure recovery process if electronically stored data is compromised or lost? Seems a hard copy should be kept if there is no clear policy for an electronic storage failure.
replies